As with the other pieces, it was important to show the van disappearing in the film but retrieve it afterwards so that I could create my visual paradox (ie. By using the toy van to project the film from). Despite the fact that I could probably buy an identical toy van on the internet, I believed it was vital to use the original for the sake of integrity and authenticity.
As the paper aeroplane was launched from the kite it slowly glided down and fell into the water. It floated on the surface but an offshore wind gently started to take it out to sea. I was forced to put down the camera, take off my clothes and jump in to swim after it. I quickly reached a point where I wasn’t sure that if I carried on chasing it I would have enough energy to make it back to the beach. I gave up and swam back to land. |
Later, standing on the beach, semi naked and exhausted, I realised I had become fixated on the authentication of the object. I also realised that this obsession didn’t make any difference to the viewer at all. Another similar red van would do as no-one would know the difference apart from me. In the past I have been adamant that the genuine authentic object was sacrosanct. I knew now, for a fact, that deep down I didn’t think this detail was as important either – it certainly wasn’t worth dying for like a stupid tourist.
I never felt in danger in the Antarctic despite its reputation for being a hostile environment. It was therefore particularly strange to find myself standing on the beach at Scheveningen after this event wondering how such an innocent activity as flying a kite suddenly became so potentially life threatening. |